Author: victor

One thing I do not understand; howcome Switzerland, where they make all controversial and critical decisions, including changing the constitution by binding referendums initiated by any group of seven people or union or political association or party, or lobby, etc., or required by law ans whose results must be implemented after the democratic popular vote, and where the decisions by the people can not be overturned or modify by the executive, the legislature or even the Supreme Court, is way better governed country, more stable, more prosperous, etc., than ANY country in which the politicians or judges make all controversial or key decisions?

Why the number of Nobel prize winners in economics, great business schools, etc., a country has does not make such country the most prosperous, more fiscally responsable, with the highest take home pay, more economic and political stability, etc.?

Howcome Switzerland, with water only as abundant natural beats the crap out of the US and even countries like Norway who are swimming in oil, and even every Scandinavian country, never mind Canada, all orher counteies in Europe larger or smaller, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Australia etc., and all authoritarian regimes?

Howcome the Swiss do that in spite of four official national lamguages and 12 etno-religious-linguist groups is far more united and politically stable and prosperous than any country with far less diversity?

I know the answer now; the Swiss have known it for more than 150 years.

The secret is that in Switzerland the voters of all those grups make all key or controversial decisions in their city, their state and at the federal national level. The Swiss keep the elected politicians on a tight leash and, a result, all lobbies are politically castrated.

Americans, Argentinians, Australians, British, Brazilians, Canadians, Danish, French, Germans, Indians, Israelis, Italians, Japanese, Mexicans, Norwegians, South Koreans, Spanish, Taiwanese and all other democracies need to put the voters first, politicians second and lobbies castrated.

The authoritarian regimes of China, Russia and all Moslem and Arab states need to get rid of their inhuman regimes that put their people clearly behind domestic animals; Dogs are allowed to bark, Donkeys to bray, Horses to neigh

Camels to grunt,

Cows to moo

Sheep and Goats to bleat, Cats to meow, Parrots even to speak yet the people of all those countries can not speak up.

TheSwissPoliticalSystem.com

it is not that Jews are bad, it is that their tribal ( legitimate interests and beliefs) often do not coincide or clash with the beliefs and or interests. That would not be a problem if Jews were not able to acquire (through ambition, work and intelligence) so much influence or be blatantly seen as rejecting the beliefs of the local majority tribes. a
At some point, the majority tribe starts to feel uncomfortable or threatened and decide they can not cede control of their lives and territory. the rest is the history of the Jews and a few others.
The only doubt is about how the Jews will be treated in the US as they lose power. Let us hope it is peaceful process. Unfortunately, history shows, often it is not the case.

The only moderm Western country I know that has solved the problem of any minority or lobby acquiring excessive control is Switzerland; in the 1800s the Swiss decided to remove two key powers from elected politicians and judges; the people decided they directly would be the final decision makers over any law or policy, they would decide by means of a democratic decision by the voters. The Swiss people also decide they woul be the decision makers concerning the constitution. Furthermore the Swiss people also decided that any 7 ordinary citizens, association, political party with or without elected representatives, union, business group, ethnic group, etc., could initiate the process to take any issue, policy or law to a referendum. They also decided not even the Supreme Court could even consider, let alone invelidate, any decision made democrstically by the people.

The intention of the Swiss was not to control the Jews or any other group. Their intention was to control politicians. Once it became evident Swiss politicians had the “Damocles’ Sword” of the power of the peoples over their heads, it became obvious to all Swiss lobbies; the big banks, big pharma, big health, big manufacture, big unions, big food, etc., that it would be a waste of time to try to get politicians to satisfy their group interest by spending money on them helping them get elected, etc., because of the final and direct authority of the voters. In Switzerland the lobbies have to openly defend their arguments, no quiet deals with politicians.

The Swiss have this system at the local, state and federal level.

Please, do not believe the California, and other states, initiatives and referendums; it is like believing a dead chicken is like a live chicken because both have feathers.

The Jews live quite happily in Switzerland and there are no issues with antisemitism. The reason?; the non Jewish citizen majority is in full control. The Swiss have no issues with any lobby; in Switzerlnd the democratic decision of the majority prevails, not the politicians, not the parties, not any lobby.

For example, in the 1800s the Swiss voters decided by majority vote that ritual killing of animals, so that the meat could be kosher, was cruel and banned such sacrifice but did not ban imports.

The hard truth is that citizens of all other democracies are second class citizens compared to the Swiss; only the Swiss have control of their politicians, lobbies and country.

In non democracies people have not more rights than domestic animal, but that is another issue.

Of course, in Switzerland you do not have foaming at the mouth antisemites, anti capitalists, anti communists, anti union, anti pharma, etc. No Nick Fuentes, no Antifa, no Trump, no Pelosis, no CNN, no New York Times, no AIPAC, no Musk, no Larry Ellison, etc.; in Switzerland every one knows the voters are in direct control amd do do by deciding multiple issues four times each year at the local, state and federal level.

Of course, because all critical issues are decide by the voters directly, no secret services, deep state or assorted creeps try to kill politicians, executives or people like Charlie Kirk or Trump or Kennedy or Reagan because it would make no difference or, more likely, the majority of voters would decide in the opposite direction.

0f course, in Switzerland, piliticians are not demagogues, they lack the power to deliver; no Trumps, no Bidens, no Kamalas, no Vances, no Starmers, no Macrons, no Trudeaus, no Carneys, etc. Neither do they have in Switzerland guys like Musk, Ellison, Adelson, etc., controlling politicians with “donations” to electoral campaigns.

Step out of your anger; step into the streets and demand the Swiss system, that is what the Swiss had to do.

Let us stop antisemitism, anti business, anti pharma, etc., by bringing to the US, Western Europe, Israel, Japan, Canada, etc., the Swiss system of real democracy, real empowerment.

Nick Fuentes, the Jews and the political system of countries where elected politicians are the authority on any law, policy and contents of the constitution.
Nick fuentes is right that “Jews”, meaning mainly the Sionists, have too much political but it is not right to blame them, “the Jews”. They are doing nothing illegal, they just are the most effective lobby in Washington, in the US, in Canada, etc.
They are the most effective lobby because they work hard, many Jews are highly motivated to succeed, often they are highly educated and articulate, wealthy and many are committed to the Jewish community; survival of Israel is one of the key concerns of many Jews who, understandably, want to have a country they can escape to when the next wave of antisemitism breaks out somewhere in the World.
Jews know another oersecution is lurking in their future. They know that because that is the pattern since the Pharaohs and Babylonians.
After the Holocaust; Jews said to themselves and the World: “never again!”.
I am not Jewish but anybody who knows any Jew knows that Jews never feel they belong 100%. I suspect that in part they do not want to belong 100% to the majority culture for fear of disappearing, on the other hand, the people of the majority culture never fully accept the Jews. It is a sort of mutually assured rejection always under the surface.
I do not know if other ethnic and cultural groups groups are less successful at lobbying because they are less motivated or just lack the resources of the Jews.
What is obvious is that Jews, particularly in the US, have amazing influence over the life of the majority of non Jews because of the influence or ownership of Jews of US media and movied. Jews also have great influence over the lives of non-Jewish Americans when they exert great influence over most US politicians, at the federal and state levels in particular, when it comes to helping Israel economically and militarily.
Jews acquire influence over US politicians because Jews just use the provisions of the US Constitution and the laws made under it.

In particular, the Jewish lobby, like the Black lobby, the Hispanic lobby, the Pharma lobby, the oil lobby, the union lobbies, etc., use money and media to control the electoral processes and the elected politicians.
They do that because in the US there is no limit to the amount of money and other resources allowed in electoral camoaigns.

The end result is that most politicians feel obliged to help their big “donors”, investors in fact.
They help them with laws regulations and policies.
Politicians also know that well paid jobs and speaking engagements await them if they lose a re-election or retire from politics.
Most politicians have to accept lobby money to mount a successful electoral camoaign.
Neither the politicians nor the Jewish lobby or other lobbies are bad people, they just do what the law allows.
Unfortunately, such system leaves many Americans with the conviction that politicians day durint campaingns that they will do this or that for them but, once the election is over, politicians have no choice other betray voters or ignore them.
This has been the case with practically all presidents, governors and orher piliticians. We can see this even with Trump, who was elected promising to put Americans first. Just look at the Epstein files, or Trump support for Netanyahu in Gaza.
The end result is Americans are highly disappointed in their politicians; they have not much above 20% approval rating.
The root problem is that lobbies have figured out how to get politicians to work for the lobby and ignore promises made to the people.
Because the problem are not the Jews, the other lobbies and th3 politicians, the way to attack the problem is to modify the US constitution along the lines of the Swiss constitution; drastically transferring final executive and legislative powers from the politicians to the voters and keeping the judges from examining the constitutionality of any decision democratically made by the people. This change automatically reduced the interest of the Swiss lobbies in politicians; Swiss politicians can not “deliver” to the lobbies because the people can overturn any decision, policy or law approved by the piliticians.
The Swiss people decide 4 times each year multiple laws, policies at the local, cantonal (state) or federal level.
The change of the constitution along the lines of the Swiss, notvalong the lines of California and other US states, will neitralize the lobbies, all of them, including the Jewish lobbies and will prevent th3 antisemitism and anti Israel feeling growing faster and wider evey day.

Fuentes should focus on changing the system and far less on the Jews because the Jews, or big pharma, big weapons, etc., are not the problem; the system is the problem.
I believe most Americans still support helping Israel to ensure its survival but soon could be a minority as more and more Americans reach the conclusion American Jews have excessive political power, that is not right what Israel is doing to Palestinians, that Israel seems to go against US policies, that most Israelis have better pensions and better health insurance than Americans, etc.

Not to mention the humiliation of the 98% non Jewish American citizens as they realize US foreign policy regarding Israel is controlled by Istaelis and US Jewish lobbies. Jews need to understand that the majority tribes constituting the US will not forever accept that a 2% non-elected Jewish tribe control their destiny, no matter how hard working, honest, talented or rich the Jews are.

Moslems!, reform or be forever behind and angry!
As long a most Moslems are dominated by faith-centered thinking, Moslem societies will be behind all non-faith dominated thinking societies.
The education and thinking Moslems are immersed in at home, tenpke, school and society at large is like a sort of intellectual burka, blind to rational observation of reality, to science, to technology and to social evolution.
How do I know? Because faith-centered thought is what kept Christians and Jews backward in Europe until the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
Both happened when the eyes of a few Christians were re-opened when they rediscovered the breakthroughs of Greek civilisation. From the Christians it jumped to the Jews and the rest is history.
The revised Christianity and Judaism accommodated (surrender?) to Greek thought on anything humans could think of.
The rest is that they spread Greek reason and its modern products of science, technology and democracy (more or less, with the exception of the Swiss who re-enacted Greek democracy almost in full).
Unfortunately, to the Christian countries far away from Europe Greek thought is still in the process of spreading.
Fortunately, some wiser non Christians like the Japanese quickly grasped Greek based thinking and took to science and technology and even democracy like fish to water.
The Koreans and the Chinese of Taiwan too. The Chinese of the mainland, finally! opened their eyes to Greek reason (but only economically), after several decades of irrational anti-faith fauth-centered Marxism (as rigid as Islam but without god). Although the Chinese of the mainland, still under the political yoke of Marxists, can not yet grasp democracy, but they will soon.

Keep in mind that the advanced Asian countries could become equals to the West once because religion never donubated their lives like Islam dominates yours. This enabled them to assimilate Gree based thought as well as the Christians and Jews did. It is by doing this they have become equals of the West in all areas.

It is not Christianity or Judaism that propelled the West above the rest for the last several centuries it us Greek thought. The religion of most religious peoples in the West is Christianity, the civilisation is Greek.

Moslems can now rectify the huge mistake they made when in the X century by turning their backs to Greek reason and brought the dark ahes to Islam.

Moslems have two options; open their minds to the Reason-centered Greek vision of humans and nature, to science, technology and freedom of will, like Christians and Jews did and becone great again, or be condemned to the silent humiliation of knowing they are behind but without understanding it us because they have not reformed Islam.

Too little too lste for Jewish podcasters to distract public opinion from the elephants in the room, which are Israel and the control by the Jewish lobby ( and by other lobbies) of US politicians. Only now are those podcasters speaking against issues like massive immigration.
In fact most Jews seemed happy with massive non white immigration, thinking a multiracial multicultural society, less white, would be safer for Jews. A double mistake because irritated whites and brought in more Jew haters.
Unfortunately that started to turn white people and even blsck people and US Hispanics against Jews.
There is only one way for Jews to save themselves and reverse the massive antisemitism now engulfing the US, which has been there for decades at a lower level, and exploded with Gaza.

That way is as follows:
Tell Israel they are grown ups now, they have to fend for themselves.
Become patriotic Americans without reservations.
Become massively fans of the Anglo Europeans who set up the US and made it the nation where millions of Jews could come and prosper like never before.
Tell fellow Jews to stop attacking white people, directly or indirectly, subtly or openly, about their culture, race or values with movies, books, articles, etc.
I know, Jews are far more integrated than Moslems and do not display the crude hostility to white America Moslems display but anybody who is not white American has heard in private comments many Jews make about whites showing less than respect.
Tell fellow Jews to stop instilling dislike for whites in your children with their comments and example. They have to make respect for Jews compatible with internal respect for others. It will also help Jews live a more authentic life; no need to pretend. This applies to hispanics, blacks, asians, who also often do not really respect that thanks to the whites they live far better and freer than in their countries of origin.
Tell fellow Jews to instill in their children what a grest people the Anglo Europeans are who brought Greek democracy to the dark religion- dominated Christian and Jewish worlds of the Middle Ages.
Tell fellow Jews, blacks and others that thanks to the whites of America slavery was abolished because they fought other whites to do the death, that is was not the blacks or the Jews or anybody else who ended slavery.
Tell fellow Jews and your children that if it were not for the whites of America and Europe, including the Russians, most Jews would have been exterminated, instead of stressing that the allies could have done more to save the Jews.
The hard truth is that Jews living in the West need to become West Firsters, patriotic, and tell fellow Jews to move to Israel if that is not possible for them.
Tell fellow Jews they have to be loyal to the US and not to Israel, with Israel just share the religion otherwise they tie themselves in self destructive loyalty knots.
This applies to all non whites and whites; all must be America firsters.
The issue of loyalty with Jews comes to a head because of the tremendous success and influence-power-money of Jews. The power and money are justly earned but the influence can be used in excess and make the white majority and other minorities nervous about who runs the country.
The current strategy of trying to silence Tucker, Fuentes and many others all it does is ensure to increase antisemitism, which at one point will culminate in persecution of Jews, as it has happened in history over and over.

Besides that there are two things Jews can do to gain true acceptance:
The first one is use your talent to bring to the US Swiss style real democracy. In it politicians have far less power than voters and, automatically, the lobbies too. In rhe Swiss system is impossible for politician to deviate from the will of the voters, because rhe voters on their own initiative can undo anything the politicians do and can also force politicians to change laws, including the constitution.
The Swiss system prevents that the majority “tribes” fear losing control of the country and also that the elites ignore the will of the people.
If the US had the Swiss system support for Israel and immigration would be decided democratically by the vote of the majority. It is quite likely the majority of US voters would support Israel to ensure its survival, but not support the insanity in Gaza.
With the Swiss system the US would also avoid the crazy right- left polarisation which happens because of the US system.
If the US had the Swiss system major political parties representing left, right and center, and about 80% of voters, would govern in coalition always.
Other parties even without representation in congress, any union, any Jewish group, any Catholic, Moslem group, any group of 7 citizens could bring about a BINDING referendum on ANY issue.
The Swiss system would also turn Israel and other democracies into real democracies in which minorities are safe, as Swiss history with their 150 year old system proves.
The other important thing Jews and Israel should do to regain support in the West is help bring down the CCP; the existencial threat to all of us and our freedoms.

If Jews keep the thought that antisemitism is because of the likes of Carlson or Fuentes, persecution and tragedy will come to Jews again. Jews deserve better but it is Jews who need to change tack if they want to be accepted, trusted, respected, appreciated and live in peaceful true harmony with the “host” tribes.

I wonder if many Moslems wonder why Western countries, and countries like Japan, South Korea, etc., are much more prosperous, more politically and economically, live longer, etc., in spite of not giving religion the importance Moslems give to Islam, in many of those countries the majority does not even believe in God. Do Moslems ever why the infidel Europeans and the like are far ahead of Moslem countries by any UN indicator of prosperity, human capital, respect for human rights, etc.

I wonder is Moslems ever wonder why the want to immigrate en masse to Western countries but Westerners only go to Moslem countries to perform extremely well paid jobs.

I wonder if Moslems ever wonder why Israel, in spite of its Gaza abomination surpasses all its neighbours in any indicator you care to compare.

I wonder if Islam today is like Christianity before the Renaissance when faith trumped readon.

I wonder if Moslems wonder if the cause of most of rhe problems I mentionef might have something to do with the prostration of most Moslems before rhe imans, not unlike Christians before the Renaissance.

I wonder if Moslems wonder why Moslems move to the West, assimilate, sparate religion from work and state thetñy often become very successful.

I wonder if Moslems wonder if it is the kind of Islam the imans preach to most Moslems that has become a sort of intellectual burka.

I wonder if Moslems realize they will have to leave by the millions if they keep insisting that the infidel Christians, Jewd, Atheists, Agnostics, Orientals, etc., will expel them by the millions as they lose patience with insanities like face covering, sharia law, scare women, etc.

Moslems can be great again but not with thinking, values and behaviours incompatible with the modern world.

I wonder if Moslem realize that their current thinking will deliver humiliation after humiliation to them at the hands of Westerners and orientals and hindus.

The US Fed, the Bank of Canada, etc., all practice Quntitative and Qualitative Lying. We all need the Swiss system. Just look at the appreciation of the Swiss Frank.

It is the result, as many other indicators, of superior fiscal and economic management. The US produces most of the theories that win Nobel Prizes in economics, the Swiss win the collective prizes generated by superior country management. Why the Swiss do it better?, it is because they have the Swiss Political System.

What is the difference? The Swiss by genius or by luck decided that the same people who raise families, manage the family income, pay their mortgages and car loans, are responsible workers, managers and business owners, are responsible neighbours and citizens, drive responsibly, etc., and who do not have to run for election ir reelection and are not high level politically appointes bureaucrats.

Ordinary peoplec are uniquely capable of making responsible decisions concerning critical issues, policies and laws in their towns, cities, cantons (similar more ir less to states or provinces but with much more autonomy on all issues). The results, for more than a century now, prove they are right.

What the Swiss people decided is to have the right to stop piliticians or push politicians regarding, laws, policies, issues. The Swiss people have the right and power and they exercise it 4 times each year voting from their homes to decide anything they consider important or controversial enough to be decided democratically by the voters directly.

They decide local, canton-state and national-federal issues but only by exception; most of the time they do not intervene, they let elected politicians alone with most executive and legislative work.

Of course, Swiss politicians know they can not behave like US, Canadian, French, Swedish, German or even Danish politicians.

The reason is obvious; the Swiss people can throw out anything piliticians do and can force politicians to do what the people want, not what the politicians or lobbies want.

In Switzerland the politicians know and that their job is to obey what the people democratically decide in one of the people initiated referendums.

They also know that they must always be in tune with the majority of the people. Now, Swiss politicianscare not dumb, they soon realized that to minimize the chances of a referendum trowing out a law or policy it would be better if the four major parties of left, right and center run rhe executive together. That is what they have been doing for decades.

In Switzerland the four parties in the executive, representing about 80% of voters govern together AS EQUALS.

Swiss elections do not have the drama of other democracies. The reason is simple; the politicians have aclot less power.

One huge benefit is also that Swiss lobbies like big banks, big pharma, big industry, big food, big weapons know that no matter how much money they “donated” to parties or politicians, politicians can not deliver, only the people can deliver.

There are other benefits. If the US had the Swiss system the current controversy about Jewish support for Israel and accusations that the Jewish lobbies control the US would not happen.

If the US had the Swiss system it is the people who would have democratically decided the level of support for Israel.

It is likely the US would have not supported what Israel is doing in Gaza but the huge benefit if there would not be massive discredit of US politicians and, much more dangerous for Israel and American Jews, the current backlash about both which threatens to bring a tragedy for Israel and Jews, at least against the militant Sionists including Jewish billionaires who have put their hard earned and deserved money in the hands of lobbies and politicians who, in the law of unintended consequences could wreck the billionaires, many other Jews and Isrsel itself.

There is a lot more good stuff about the Swiss system, like higher standard of living, privately funded and managed universal healrh care and best in World, much better control of immigration, far more unity in spite of many more political parties, four founding peoples, four official languages and on and on. Go out, buy yourself a bar of Swiss chocolate and munch on it while you use your smartphone to get a taste for Swiss democracy; it tastes even better than Swiss chocolate.

TheSwissPoliticalSystem.com

To all those who talk about putting America first; stop talking about your Christianity about whites, it it divisive and stupid; many Jews put America ahead of Judaism and Israel, as they should, so do many Blacks of any belief, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, agnostics, atheists, etc. Even many Moslems do so. I speak of Moslems separately because it seems that most Moslems come from countries where they believe the state must also be Moslem and they do not separate religion from state.
In my opinion all countries who claim to be democracies should stop referring to themselves as Christian countries. Besides, Christianity, like all other religions is not philosophically compatible with democracy for one basic reason; democracy is about men discussing, debating, using human reasoning, what ideas are best to live our lives and to govern the country. Democracy is not about following what this or that god or prophet or holy book or anyone else tells people The Truth, how to live or what is right or wronf for all time. Democracy is about humans deciding freely everything making comoatible as much as possible the freedom and rights of individuals and the freedom and rights of the community and the nation.
Real democrats of any religious persuasion or political belief must put democracy first and country first. Christians, Jews, Hindus, etc., Whites, Blacks, Indians, Natives, Hispanics, Arabs, Japanese, Chinese, etc., must put democracy and country first.
All of us must put loyalty to our democrat fellow citizen ahead of loyalty to any foreigner of any country even if he is of our race or religion.
We must be harshly critical of any fellow citizen, who is more loyal to a system contrary to democracy and nation; for example, many communists, socialists, globalists who do nit believe in their own country or people and want to dismantle or radically change it with laws and policies not specifically aproved in a democratic vote by the people, such as immigration, taxation, national debt, abortion, capital punishment, etc.
We must also be harshly critical of those who resist change the majority may want. For that is also necessary the people decide taxation, education, universal health care, etc.
There is only one way in a democracy to do things; everyone must put democracy and country and local community ahead of religion, race or culture and all major or controversial decisions must be decided democrstically by the people by means of Swiss style binding referendums. That way the Swiss decide any important or controversial issues in cities, towns, cantons (states or provinces or prefectures).
Let us put democracy and country first.

It is a Catch-22 for Jews around the world who support Israel above all else. For example, if they cancel, suppress, or target figures like Nick Fuentes—who accuses those Jews of controlling Hollywood, media, finance, and U.S. politicians—they only confirm his claims and those of like-minded voices, including Tucker Carlson, Glenn Greenwald, and many others.

Of course, such suppression will bolster the number of Americans and people worldwide who believe Jews wield too much power, especially by using it to aid a foreign country.

Most fair-minded people around the world support Israel’s survival as a nation with a Jewish majority—religious or not—as a safe haven for Jews. For most, it makes sense that Jews grew tired of persecution and second-class citizenship in nearly all non-Jewish countries.

Many even view Israel’s creation in Palestine as fair, despite the inevitable conflict with Palestinians—even if those Palestinians are Muslims descended from those who conquered that region of the Eastern Roman (Christian) Empire, where millions of Christians, Jews, and Samaritans once lived.

All of them were treated as second-class citizens under Muslim rule, paying taxes for not being Muslim, plus heavier levies if they owned land or traded.

Over centuries, this encouraged conversions to Islam, including among those seeking to join the ruling elite.

So, when Jews began migrating to Palestine—especially after the Holocaust—most in the West sided with the Jewish newcomers. Besides, they arrived as peaceful immigrants.

Quite naturally, the Palestinian majority (mostly Muslim, with some Christians) felt threatened by the prospect of becoming a minority, victims of an earlier version of “population replacement”.

The Moslems, and the 10% Christian Atabs too, revolted; the Jews fought back and prevailed from the start. After every conflict, the Jews gained more power and land.

The final result is what we have today: Palestinians are citizens of Israel or live in Gaza and the West Bank—territories which together are five times smaller than Israel.

Unfortunately, Palestinians have suffered under poor leaders unwilling to accept Israel’s existence. Theystubbornly but unrealistically, thought they could “throw the Jews into the sea”. They grossly miscalculated their military force-ability in relation to the Jews, instead of accepting Israel as long as a viable Palestinian state coould be established.

Quite naturally, Palestinian intransigence created Jewish intransigency and more and more Jews opter for a mindset which coould be described us: “you hate us, you want to kill us, you want to throw us into the sea?, to hell with you!”.

More and more Jews felt fustified in thinking: “you want to destroy us as a people and a nation?, we will destroy you!”.

Over the years, the Jews of Israel, knowing themselves stronger militarily, economically and technogically than the Palestinians, and backed by the Jews in the US and by US politicians, could not resist the temptation of taking the opportunity to recreate the Biblical Israel which went from the Nile to Turkey.

Perhaps they do not want that far but who could fault rhem from including Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza? They feel strong, the Palestinians are weak and make stupud attacks like October 7, why did they expect?, that Israel would surrender? Insane illogic

At the same time, many Jews migrated to the U.S., etc., where they prospered and grew increasingly influential there, in Canada and other Western countries. Logically, they used that influence to support Israel.

Up until recently, most in the West remained strongly supportive of Israel, due to the Holocaust’s shadow and the effective efforts of Jews to keep its memory alive through books, movies, museums, and more.

Perhaps they were too successful; a number of non-Jews began to find it unfair—or even felt resentful—that Jews seemed to “push” their tragedy “too much”, especially when other horrors killed far more millions, like the Ukrainian Holodomor under Communists, their vast gulags, or the tens of millions starved by Mao and the CCP.

Other non-Jews started to feel tbat it was u fair lf Jews to even criticise the US of not doing enough to save Jews from the nazis, even if it was thanks to the Americans that many more Jews were not killed by the nazis. After all, if the US had not entered WW II it is very likely that Germany and Japan would have won the war.

Perhaps it is true Americans coyld have done more but to most non-Jews such criticism does not seem fair given what America did for European Jews.

But Jews managed, intentionally or not, to make many Americans uncomfortable; perhaps guilry, perhaps resentful, not good.

Jews (and others, perhaps mostly Marxists) accused the U.S. of more, turning away Jewish refugees, discriminating against American Jews (e.g., quotas limiting Jewish university admissions). While all this is true, more and more Americans grew uncomfortable with the endless guilt.

As often happens, some concluded America was inherently bad, and that their (mostly white) parents and grandparents belonged to a bad people.

Add to that the emphasis by leftist Jews and non-Jews on white guilt over Black slavery—despite whites abolishing it, and despite Jewish and other slave owners—and many whites felt even more burdened.

Guilt often metastizes into one of two things: It erodes the self-worth of the guilty (here, mostly white Americans and Anglo-Europeans), or it morphs into resentment and anger toward those seen as its source—in this case, Jews and leftists (often Marxists posing as Democrats).

These anti-Jewish sentiments have likely been simmering quietly for years. You could sense them in private conversations, but people stayed silent to avoid being labeled antisemites, facing job repercussions, etc.

I have no doubt Jews believed they were doing the right thing—ensuring the Holocaust’s memory endured. Unfortunately, many non-Jews found the insistence “excessive.”

What counts as “excessive” is subjective; reasonable Jews and non-Jews disagree on both sides.

But there’s more. Due to two flaws in the U.S. system—flaws predating significant Jewish presence or influence—Jews and other lobbies realized the advantages of swaying elected officials.

In the U.S. and similar democracies, voters elect politicians who then hold unchecked executive and legislative power. Once in office, there’s no mechanism for citizens to veto laws, force new policies, or intervene between elections. Voters can only write letters, post on social media, protest, or wait for the next vote. New politicians, however, wield the same unchecked power as their predecessors.

From the start, the U.S. Constitution permitted lobbying, so big money, unions, professional groups, and businesses exerted far more influence than ordinary voters ever could.

America never had pure “government for the people”—it was always for special interests with resources.

Logically, Jews—like all ethnic groups—lobbied politicians. Jews simply proved more successful, and I can’t criticize them for that; it’s legal.

The situation worsened into a disaster, effectively gutting representative democracy, when the Supreme Court in 1976 (Buckley v. Valeo) and 2010 (Citizens United) removed limits on campaign financing. These decisions, to me, are insane.

They destroyed democracy because all U.S. politicians now depend on massive donations and in-kind support to run viable campaigns. Reject them, and you’re unelectable. The result? Every politician owes favors to lobbies upon taking office.

A candidate might decline one lobby’s money, but they’ll need others’—or face silence in the media.

The richer or more influential the donor or group, the more sway they hold over more politicians.

Donors fund pro-candidate ads but can also bury them with attack ads or boost rivals. For powerful lobbies, their endorsement or opposition can decide elections. Big media or influencers like Joe Rogan can tip the scales, as in the last election.

Lobbies also realized that it was necessary to “donate” to both parties as a sort of insurance policy to have the ear of politicians on key lobby issues, regardless of which party wins.

This means that all politicians are reduced to enact policies the majority of the people want as long as it does not irritate the key lobbies too much for the next electoral campaign.

In other words, democracy in the US is real democracy only in areas that satisfy the majority on issues not critical for key lobbies. As Trump could say: “it is fake democracy”, except that he can not sau that because he too has no option but to practice it.

The Jewish lobby in particular, can mobilize vast funds and resources like no other group, using perfectly legal means.

This dependence of politiciams on lobbies is so deep that even a billionaire Trump accepted hundreds of millions from Musk, Mrs. Adelson, and others.

Post-election, he betrayed promises on Epstein files and H-1B visas—and he can’t champion majority-will issues like universal healthcare.

U.S. politicians are beholden to some lobby. They also know lobbies offer sweet post-office perks: million-dollar book deals, high-paid speeches, corporate board seats, foundation heads, university presidencies, or consulting gigs—even cushy jobs with donors.

Judges, too, meddle in the popular will, corrupted by partisanship. Democratic appointees block Trump relentlessly; Republican ones do the same to Democrats—though Democrats have more activist judges.

Those judges, and prosecutors corrupt democracy because they undermine the trust of the people in the system; in the US, trust in Congress is around 20%. In the Presiden is not much better and normally below 50%

In my view, all lobbies—even noble ones—undermine democracy. They mean no harm; they just advance their interests. Like termites gnawing a house. Termites don’t intend collapse—they just eat. But when pipes burst or fire strikes, the house falls, and the termites perish with it.

The Jewish influence over U.S. politicians, media, and Hollywood was uneasy but tolerated for years.

The real explosion came with Israel’s actions in Gaza. Yes, Hamas committed atrocities against innocent Jews on October 7. But painfully for Israel and its global Jewish supporters—including in the U.S.—most Americans concluded Israel overreacted.

Even a number Jews agree, some very vocally.

Protests also erupted worldwide against Israel.

Here, pro-Israel Jews and Istael made a fatal error. Perhaps from affective reasons, perhap for a touch of arrogance, misreading fellow Americans, a reflex to equate Israel criticism with antisemitism.

The protests I suspect also reflect frustration over years of U.S. policy prioritizing Israel over American interests—the explosion of protests panicked Israel and Jews supporting it. They unleashed their full resources, broadly branding street and campus protesters, media figures, and YouTubers as antisemites.

They are compounding the mistake by having people like Larry Ellison buying Tik Tok; everyone believes the goal is to silence tiktokers critical of Israel, of Larry Ellison, of AIPAC, of the ADL, etc. Quite logically such actions will create even more hostility towards the Jews supporting Israel.

We are in a deadly spiral: More suppression, more cancelling, more deplatforming, more “antisemitism” accusations breed more resentment and in the eyes of many confirms the “Jewish control” narratives.

If Jews silence Fuentes, Carlson, and others, anti-Jewish feelings will accelerate. As Jews are only 1-2% of the population, this could spell disaster for Jews—and doom Israel. There is no way the Jews suppirting Israel can control the situation over the ling term. In fact, I believe we are at the end of the long term.

There’s one sane exit: U.S. Jews must align with most Americans on Gaza—condemn Israel’s excesses and push for a viable Palestinian state.

Another key step for U.S. Jews and Israel to regain credibility and respect in the US among non-Jews, at least among manyis to help dismantle the CCP, bringing democracy to China and the world.

Finally, all democracies—including the U.S. and Israel—must amend constitutions along Swiss lines to avoid the current crisis in representative democracies, Israel included: Become true people’s democracies, with direct power over politicians.

The polarisation caused by the Gaza issue, by massive legal and illegal immigration, by the national debt, ny poligicians ignoring the will of most voters would have been prevented if we had the Swiss system, as they have been preventef in Switzerland.

In Switzerland, lobbying loses potency—even for giant multinationals—because politicians can’t deliver without public buy-in. The lobbird must argue directly to voters.

The system also yields multiparty executives, decade after decade. This means that in every legislature approximately 80% of the voters are represented in the executive, which reflects the composition of the legislatute.

The system produces of decisions matching public will. Furthermore, by the referendums the people can call on any issue, it is assurex that government stays aligned witj the will of voters.

This system ensures efficient governmemt and fair government.

I have no doubt that it is this unique Swiss system, now spreadeing to, surprise! Taiwan, that without natural resources beyond water, Switzerland has a higher GDP per capita than the U.S., far lower debt, better jobs, lower unemployment, lots of guns but minimal crime, remarkable unity amid multiculturalism, multilingualism, and multireligion, world-class universal (capitalist) healthcare, lower taxes, managed immigration, no wars, superior chocolate, and enduring democracy for over 150 years.

Of course, Switzerland is the most democratic country and because of that the most stable.

By the way, the ranking of democracies by the Economist, Amnesty International amd others do not place Switzerland as the mumber one democracy in a cayegory of its lwn, they place it behind Norway, Denmark and several others, it is ridiculous. I do not have space here to show why but I can and in any forum or debate anywhere.

Approval of Swiss politicians by voters is around 80%, compare that with the US figure, and even Canada or the Scandinavians. All other democracies rank below Switzerland.

Some people say in Switzerland voter turnout at referendums and elections is often not very high, around 40%, although sometimes referendums reach 70%. There is an obvious explanation; the Swiss vote in elections every four years but vote four times per year, mostly from their homes, to decide all sort of issues, laws, policies and changes to the constitution that in most cases the people themselves bring to a referendum.

It is important to note that 90% of the Swiss people every year cast their vote for an election or a referendum, no other country comes even close to this level of citizen participation and devision making, none.

Like the U.S., Switzerland started with the U.S. Constitution but quickly amended it. There, people are first-class citizens because the vote do decide isdues, not just to elect politicians; in other democracies we are second-class citizens. In dictatorships like China, the people are free like hardworking farm animals.

Those who wield money politically risk losing it all if democracy crumbles. Sustainable democracy demands one thing: Politicians must align with majority views on big or controversial issues—no exceptions. The Swiss system demonstrates decade after decade that delivers like no other.

For details, see TheSwissPoliticalSystem.com and similar resources.

Look Nick: things like “Hitler was cool” or “I admire Stalin” will destroy you. People will even say you are Deep State or Mossad to discredit all other criticism of the Sionists you claim to despise. There is valid criticism of excessive US politician’s support for Israel although in my opinion Israel and the American Jews and Jewish organisations supporting Israel they are just better at lobbying and pressuring US politicians than anybody else. if they had the money and power and organisational ability; would not the Islamists, the Indians, the Hispanics, the Blacks, the Italians, the Poles, the Native Americans, big Pharma, big Farm, big Weapons, big unions, big Health, big Insurance, big Manufacturing, big Retail and on and on, would influence the politicians just like Israel and its friends in the US do.
Do not blame Israel and its supporters, unless they do illegal things which sometimes they might do, do not blame the politicians supporting Israel to levels you might consider wrong because they often seem to place the interests of Israel ahead of US interests. The politicians can not duly do what the voters who elected them want them to do.
Here lies the reason why Republican and Democrat politicians at the federal level and state level have to satisfy the lobbies on the issues that are very important for the lobbies.
1. The US Constitution grants all political power to the political class. This is a very strong motivator for all lobbies to find ways to pressure-have the ear of all politicians. The lobbies know politicians need money to win primaries and election to office, have media support (old media or new media) and also need or want to secure a good living after leaving politics when they retire or lose an election. Lobbies are prepared to spend lots of money backing politicians who back their interestd and use “donations” in money or in kind to win the favour of politicians. sometimes the lobbies will donate money if the pilitician promises, for example, to oppose universal health care, sometimes they increase the pressure by telling the politician that if he is not prepared to help they have no choice but to donate to a rival, perhaps because the other guy is warmer or less hostile to the wishes of the lobby. Yes, another lobby will donate if the politician supports universal health care, the “winning” is the one with more money and or more influence over voters. In other words, the more powerful lobby is more likely to win the support of the politician to criticise the opponents of the wishes of the lobby, vote to pass a law or regulation favouring the lobby, etc. in one wsy or anorher all politicians owe big favours to onebor another or several lobbies because every politician is contacted and gets donations from many lobbies; the same politician might get money from the big Pharma lobby to lower the criteria for what is considered high blood pressure, this means that doctos will prescribe medication for patients that under the current criteria would not be medicated. The new criteria generates millions or even billions in profits for the producers of the drugs every year forever. Quite rationally, such companies are happy to continue helping the politician with never ending “donations”, millions in advances for his new book, big money for speaking engagements, appointment to company boards and on and on. Lobbies also work on and with top bureaucrats; sonetimes a employee of a company is appointed to a government position im which he can influence the politician with the “appropiate” opinion, sonetimes with his own decisions applying policy or law, etc. There are one million ways for lobbies to influence politicians. Another one is saying “honest” things like: “if the new criteria for blood pressure is approved we will need to expand our production capacity to serve your area of the country and will need a new factory ( distribution center) whatever, in your state.
Your imagination is the limit as of how many lobbies donate money and other benefits to politicians.
of course, politicians are good demagogues, Trump included, and will speak in ways to please the ear of the people with catchy slogans and promises.
2. Another huge factor that breaks the democratic goal of doing what the majoritu of voters want is that the US Constitution considers lobbying part of the democratic process. You can guess who has the money, resources, staff, media contacts or even owns medis to lobby politicians. Yes, it is the lobbies not the average voter.
3. To kill the democratic process forever the US Supreme Court ruled some 20 years ago that using money in politics in the form of campaign donations, political action commitees, etc., is part of free expression, like free expression, there must not be a limit on how much money can be used in political campaigns.
The rest is what we know ALL US poluticians have to please one lobby one rich person or another, orherwise there is no way his campaign will be competitive, each US politician is indebted to one lobby or another and often to several. The Israeli lobby is not the problem, neither is the pharma lobby or any other, the problem is the US Constitution.
The remedy to bring real democracy to the US and othet democrscies lies in what the Swiss did in the 1800s when they ammended their US-inspired constitution; they transferred final authority over any law or policy and over the Constitution from politocians and judges to the people. In other words Swiss lobbies have little teeth because ANYTHING politicians decide can be overthrown by people. In other words, Swiss lobbies know that politicians have to be highly in tune with the will of the people. Big business or any other lobby in Switzerland has to make its case to the people. In other words, the democrstics filter of the people directly deciding has to be passed. In the case of support for Israel, the Anerican Jews who want the high level of support Israel gets from the US, would have to gather a number of signatures, perhaps 1/2% of registred voters with a proposal for specific assistance for Israel and the proposal would go to a binding referendum. Such way of addressing important issues is really democratic and will remove the current highly polarized discussion, antisemitism included from US politics. Of course the fear of anothet Hitler will not be present. Israel would have much more reliable support. Yes, perhaps Isrsel would have had to act with more restrain in Gaza so as not to alienate the majority of Americans but would retain support to ensure its survival. in other words the lobby system of the US is endangering the long term survival of Israel and even the safety of Jews in the US. The Swiss system would aldo prevent the suicidal distraction that the discussion over Israel causes and prevent attention to the real enemy of civilisation which is for all of us CCP-run China.

Time to bring the Swiss system.